Fifthly, the ruling on replacing the slaughter of the gift with charity

Delay the Qur'aan, Sunnah, and the consensus and fill out the excuses that it is not permissible to replace the slaughter of the gift with its value. As for the book, he says: “It is from the enjoyment of Umrah to Hajj, what is facilitated by guidance, who did not find fasting three days in the pilgrimage and seven if you returned ([Al-Baqarah verse 196]. The face of the significance: that God Almighty enjoined on the owner of the guidance in the case of ability if he did not find a gift or price,Umrah Package December 2017 giving the cheap rates of hajj and umrah. As for the Sunnah, the evidence in this regard is consistent with the Qur'aan. As for the consensus, the Sahaabah and the followers and those who follow them from the diligent people have taken the evidence indicated by the Qur'aan, and the Sunnah indicates that it is obligatory to offer guidance to the one who enjoys it and the one who compares it. If he does not find a gift or does not find the price, then he fasts ten days three times in the Hajj and seven if he returns to his family. That.

As for filling the excuses, it is permissible to say that replacing the slaughter of the gift with the trust in its value has led to the expansion of the doors of the law, for example, it is said: the expense of Hajj instead of Hajj, because of its difficulty in this era. And there is almost related to the one who begs himself to say the permissibility we mention below and then follow every suspicion of its answer.

The first suspicion: It may be said that the permissible because of the difficulty of organizing the slaughter at the present time with the survival of the spoiler as it is, and perhaps increased with the increasing number of pilgrims. This misconception can be answered by one of the following matters: that the misuse of the order by the people is not permitted to be transferred to an order which they have not initiated on the grounds that it is easier for them to apply.

Secondly, this is a ruling based on an annulled interest. The scholars have decided that the interests of the three departments are considered to be of interest and that the interest is canceled. On it or on the price of it goes to fast.

The third is that this worship is meant to shed blood, but meat is intended by the second intention. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): "God will not receive her flesh or blood, but he will receive the piety of you."

The second suspicion is that some pilgrims do not give the price of the gift they owe to the deceased and their workers themselves in the power of attorney, since they do not engage in buying, slaughtering, and honoring the meat, because it is not possible for them and fear of loss due to overcrowding, hardship or embarrassment.

It is possible to answer this suspicion by answering the first suspicion. Moreover, if a person who buys a gift for him and slaughters him and distributes it to those who are entitled to the shar'i status, he is exempted from the custody of the gift, and he becomes the custodian of the person who became an agent to buy, slaughter, the power of attorney is lawful.

The third suspicion is that the prevention of evil is provided to bring interests and thus to ward off evil for the nation and bring to its own interests.

It is not correct to say: The slaughter of gifts is corrupt and if it is prevented by what they mentioned, this ritual is canceled and the price is correct. Because of the rules prescribed in the Shariah That the harms are degrees and that the interests are degrees and that it is permissible to miss the two best interests in order to collect the highest and commit the lesser of the spoilers to avoid them as a grave and to prevent evil. The interest is more likely than what is thought to be a misrepresentation of the texts on their positions and purposes.

Second: This opens the door of manipulation in the law does not have texts value, but the value of the issue of the minds of the minds of perceptions that they claim interests deserve to be submitted to the evidence. Thirdly, the prohibition of worship is based on the timing. It is not permissible to turn away from the project except with valid evidence that is required for the transgression and any legislation based on timing. It is not subject to ijtihad.

Fourthly: It is obligatory for him to give it to his due, as it says in the verse: " Eat from it and feed the needy poor " [Al-Hajj 28], as well as all other rights, such as zakat, vows, kafarat and others.

Fifth: The street did not prevent slaughter in any place of the Haram as he said - peace be upon him -:)   I have sacrificed here and all of me, from Mecca and Mecca, a road and a desert.

Sixth: The treatment of the meat problem in Mina: The problem of meat can be dealt with the following matters: First: The detection of what is sold to ensure its validity is guidance in terms of age and safety of diseases and contraindications of parts and a mark is known that this sacrifice is fragmented and otherwise prohibited.

The second is to expand the awareness of the pilgrims with a statement of the division and what is not, so that they can only provide insight. Third: Increase the number of massacres in different places of Mina and Mecca and guide people to it. Fourth: To facilitate access to these meat to the poor by: 1 - if possible. 2. Assisting them in bringing them home. 3 - Expanding the distribution of what is greater to the poor of the Haram on the poor outside the Haram and giving the poor who are outside the Haram to pay the Zakat for the poor, not the poor of the country of money if given the poor country of money need and no one deserves, so the gift transferred to the poor countries neighboring Mecca.

The extension of the power of attorney to slaughter the gift in an orderly manner that ensures the interest of the owner of the gift and the interest of the poor and the public interest and in which people are supervised by the state to apply this. This is what is easy to mention and God is a success. May God bless our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions?

Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta.

Member, Vice-President.

Abdullah bin Sulaiman bin Manea Abdullah bin Abdul Rahman bin Ghudian Abdul Razzaq Afifi Ibrahim bin Mohammed Al - Sheikh.